Comparison of laparoscopic and abdominal methods of hysterectomy from patient’s perspective
نویسندگان
چکیده
Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the postoperative pain and satisfaction of patients who underwent total laparoscopic or abdominal hysterectomy for benign gynecologic conditions. Materials and Methods: This study was a prospective, randomized trial. A visual analogue scale and patient satisfaction score scale were used to evaluate the patients’ postoperative satisfaction rates. Seventy-one patients who underwent total laparoscopic hysterectomy were compared with 68 patients who underwent total abdominal hysterectomy for benign gynecologic indications. Results: The groups were similar with respect to age, race, gravidity and parity status, and uterine weight. Hospital stay; need for analgesic use; visual analogue scale pain scores at 12, 24, and 36 hours; patient satisfaction scores at 24 and 48 hours and one week; and blood loss were statistically lower in the laparoscopic hysterectomy group than in the abdominal hysterectomy group (p<0.001). Conclusion: Laparoscopic hysterectomy was superior to abdominal hysterectomy in terms of short-term followup, postoperative pain, and satisfaction with the operation scar.
منابع مشابه
Comparison of laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy with traditional hysterectomy for cost-effectiveness to employers.
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to compare the cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy to traditional total abdominal hysterectomy and total vaginal hysterectomy with regard not only to direct hospital costs but also to indirect costs. STUDY DESIGN This was a combined retrospective cohort study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2) that was conducted in a ...
متن کاملThe Feasibility of Societal Cost Equivalence between Robotic Hysterectomy and Alternate Hysterectomy Methods for Endometrial Cancer
Objectives. We assess whether it is feasible for robotic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer to be less expensive to society than traditional laparoscopic hysterectomy or abdominal hysterectomy. Methods. We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of patient characteristics, operative times, complications, and hospital charges from all (n = 234) endometrial cancer patients who underwent hyster...
متن کاملMulticenter analysis comparing robotic, open, laparoscopic, and vaginal hysterectomies performed by high-volume surgeons for benign indications.
OBJECTIVE To compare perioperative outcomes between robotic-assisted benign hysterectomies and abdominal, vaginal, and laparoscopic hysterectomies when performed by high-volume surgeons. METHODS A multicenter data analysis compared 30-day outcomes from consecutive robotic-assisted hysterectomies performed by high-volume surgeons (≥60 prior procedures) at nine centers with records retrieved fr...
متن کاملDoes Route of Hysterectomy Affect Outcome in Obese and Nonobese Women?
OBJECTIVE Our objective was to compare the surgical outcomes of obese women having hysterectomy according to the route (abdominal, vaginal, or laparoscopic) of the procedure. METHODS A chart review of 293 hysterectomy procedures was performed. Data were collected including operative and anesthesia time, estimated blood loss, change in hematocrit, hospital stay, complications, conversion to la...
متن کاملHysterectomy for benign uterine pathology: comparison between robotic assisted laparoscopy, classic laparoscopy and laparotomy.
OBJECTIVE Hysterectomy is one of the most important surgeries in gynecology and requires a lot of care and skill. In this study we attempt to make a comparison between laparoscopic hysterectomy, robotic assisted hysterectomy and abdominal hysterectomy for treatment of uterine pathology. MATERIALS AND METHODS We conducted a study comparing 29 patients who were treated by robotic assisted lapar...
متن کامل